Sunday, 30 September 2012

Markets Up? Don't Retire

Author(s): 

Running out of money in retirement is the biggest fear facing investors in the current economic environment, according to Millionaire Corner research, but a new study from the University of Missouri indicates that investors who retire at market highs often face trouble down the road.

“Potential retirees often will first meet their targeted retirement savings goals during an up market and will be tempted to retire at that point,” Rui Yao, an assistant professor of personal financial planning, said in a statement. “The problem with this strategy is that the economy runs in cycles, meaning that after a peak, the market will take a downturn.”

People who retire shortly before the markets head south risk significant losses to retirement savings, Yao said. She added, “This could result in many retirees outliving their retirement savings and facing financial hardships toward the end of their lives.”

What’s the alternative? Yao recommends against retiring immediately after achieving retirement savings goals, especially during economic boom years. Rather, she advises waiting and retiring during a downturn, as long as investors have saved enough to enjoy a comfortable standard of living. The strategy allows retirement savings to grow beyond initial targets as the markets begin to recover, enabling retirees to build financial cushions to weather future down cycles.

Market fluctuations can have an even more powerful effect when both members of a married couple choose to retire at the end of an up market, according to Yao, who found that working Americans were more likely to retire when they had a retired spouse.

“It makes sense that many married couples would want to retire around the same time,” Yao said. “However, if both spouses decide to retire close to the end of an up market, the household would have little to no cushion should their retirement portfolios be affected by an economic downturn.”

What’s the biggest take-away of Yao’s study? Investors need a better understanding of the financial challenges they are likely to face in retirement, she said, and may benefit from seeking professional retirement planning advice. 

Source: http://www.millionairecorner.com/article/markets-dont-retire

this website to learn more

Vanguard’s Dividend, REIT and S&P 500 ETFs are great news for ETF Investors

Vanguard Canada appears to have been listening to ETF investors. The fund company known for its low-cost, plain vanilla index products will shortly be adding five new ETFs to its existing line up of six ETFs. The new ETFs are:

Vanguard FTSE Canadian High Dividend Yield Index ETF

The ETF will track an index of Canadian stocks that sport a high dividend yield. There is very little information on the index available currently other than it is market cap weighted and focused on dividend income. The management fee is 0.30%. It is worth noting here that the new dividend ETF will be 0.20% to 0.30% cheaper than popular Canadian dividend ETFs such as the iShares Dow Jones Canada Select Dividend Index Fund (XDV) and the iShares S&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats Index Fund (CDZ).

Vanguard FTSE Canadian Capped REIT Index ETF

This ETF will track the FTSE Canada All Cap Real Estate Capped 25% Index. The index is composed of publicly-traded companies in the Canadian real estate sector with each constituent’s weight capped at 25%. The management fee is 0.35%, which is 0.20% cheaper than the popular iShares S&P/TSX Capped REIT Index ETF (XRE).

An interesting question is whether the new Vanguard REIT ETF is still worth unbundling to save on MERs. Let’s assume that an investor wants to hold five REITs in equal weights directly and rebalance once every year for the real estate portion of the portfolio. If the investor pays $10 per trade, the break-even point will be just $14,300.

Vanguard S&P 500 ETFs

The Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF finally provides Canadian investors access to a low-cost, US market ETF that does not hedge currency exposure. This ETF will provide investors with two advantages: (1) Eliminate the need to exchange Canadian dollars even if it is through low-cost currency conversion alternatives like the Norbert Gambit and (2) Provide Canadians with a way to avoid headaches with US Estate Taxes entirely. However, the Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF will incur a drag of about 0.30% in RRSP and RRIF accounts compared to directly holding an US-listed ETF (See post on how withholding taxes affect the choice of international investments for an explanation).

The Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) is the currency-hedged version of the Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF. Both ETFs will charge a management fee of 0.15% and both ETFs will simply hold the US-listed Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). VOO has an expense ratio of 0.05% but the Canadian-listed S&P 500 ETF management fees indicated are inclusive of VOO’s expenses.

Vanguard Canadian Short-Term Corporate Bond Index ETF

This fund will track the Barclays Global Aggregate Canadian Credit 1-5 year Float Adjusted Bond Index, which is composed of investment grade corporate bonds with maturities ranging from one to five years. The management fee is 0.15%.

Note that the ETF MERs are likely to be slightly higher because certain operating expenses such as brokerage commissions and harmonized sales taxes will be charged to the fund in addition to the management fee. You can read the ETF prospectus here.

You can read Canadian Couch Potato’s take on the new ETFs here and a discussion on this topic on the Canadian Money Forum here.

Related Reading:

Vanguard’s Dividend, REIT and S&P 500 ETFs are great news for ETF Investors is brought to you by Canadian Capitalist -- Helping you to invest & prosper.

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ccapitalist/~3/yVqBWjZtwQU/

url view

Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement

The Journal travels to Iowa where one group, Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement (CCI), has been helping ordinary citizens fight for change for more than three decades.

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/bmjvodcast/~3/DEGRCYiFG1g/profile3.html

united states url

Saturday, 29 September 2012

Trudy Lieberman and Dr. Marcia Angell

Bill Moyers sits down with Trudy Lieberman, director of the health and medical reporting program at the CUNY Graduate School of Journalism, and Marcia Angell, senior lecturer in social medicine at Harvard Medical School and former editor in chief of the New England Journal of Medicine.

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/bmjvodcast/~3/Wk9eGhGbarg/profile.html

read more... read this

Friday, 28 September 2012

Ohio's Absentee Ballots Show GOP Enthusiasm, Not Dem

Moe Lane, RS
We[**] got a guy out there doing just that, and the link to his spreadsheet is here.Executive summary: the process is ongoing, and what’s being tracked are absentee/early ballot REQUESTS, not turned-in ballots.  So it’s not telling us who’s ahead in Ohio; it’s merely telling us what we know of which party’s members are asking for ballots.  In other words, it’s a possible measure of voter enthusiasm in Ohio.  So…

Source: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2012/09/28/ohio039s_absentee_ballots_show_gop_enthusiasm_not_dem_291445.html

visite site web link

British Columbia Invests in Solar Power

The Government of Canada is advancing the development of clean technologies through a $20,000 investment to harness solar power for the Osoyoos Desert Centre in British Columbia. The funding will help the Osoyoos Desert Society to purchase and install solar equipment designed to provide the Osoyoos Desert Centre with a source of year-round power. The [...]

Source: http://www.alternative-energy-news.info/press/bc-solar-power/

go here go here now

Debating Citizens United v. FEC

Libertarian journalist Nick Gillespie and legal scholar Lawrence Lessig discuss public financing of campaigns and the effects of money on politics.

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/bmjvodcast/~3/7-9wXMbDehk/profile1.html

see here see page

Thursday, 27 September 2012

Read the Internal Document that Contradicts BP’s Claims on Oil Flow

Sasha Chavkin

See the internal BP document. Rep. Ed Markey has been among BP's toughest critics in Congress following the Deepwater Horizon blowout, accusing it, among other things, of lowballing its estimates of oil flow.

On Sunday, Markey was at it again. As you may have read, the Boston Democrat released an internal BP document that shows that early company estimates for worst-case oil flow scenarios were far higher than the company has ever acknowledged -- up to 100,000 barrels per day if all containment mechanisms were to fail. Take a look at the document for yourself.

The document is not dated, but a statement from Rep. Markey that accompanied its release said that BP's oil flow estimate at the time the document was made available to Congress was 5,000 barrels per day, and its worst-case scenario was 60,000 barrels per day, figures the company provided for much of the month of May.

The 100,000-barrels-per-day scenario contrasts sharply with the company’s public pronouncements at the time.

“I think those estimates of 70,000, with due respect to the experts, don't match the many, many experts and scientists that are involved in this in a unified way," Bob Dudley, BP’s managing director and the newly anointed chief of the company’s spill response, said on MSNBC on May 14. "It's not just a BP estimate ... 70,000 feels like a little exaggeration, a little scare-mongering."

Source: http://feeds.propublica.org/~r/propublica/energy-environment/~3/9XiXjMWeUCw/

this website to learn more

Germany May Throw Markets Bearish Curve

According to the Wall Street Journal (WSJ), Germany wants to delay Spain’s formal request for aid. If Spain continues to drag its feet, stocks, commodities, and precious metals could slip into correction mode. Below are the potentially bearish points from the September 24 story:

Progress on two of the euro zone’s most pressing concerns—containing the crises in Greece and Spain—faces holdups up in Germany, where Chancellor Angela Merkel is reluctant to ask parliament to vote on measures that are likely to raise fierce opposition from within her own coalition.

Spain’s decision on whether to seek bond-market intervention by the European Central Bank, as financial markets are hoping, is also in limbo. That is partly because Germany has signaled that it doesn’t want Spain to make the move.

Ms. Merkel’s aides are searching for a way to close the Greek shortfall without asking German lawmakers for more money. Any request for fresh bailouts would likely spur bruising, and politically damaging, fight in Germany’s lower house of parliament, the Bundestag.

On September 23, we outlined the five fundamental drivers that could spark a stock market correction. The first concern listed was “Spain may choose to delay a formal request for aid.” The news that Germany may be encouraging the delay only heightens our concern on this issue.

Even under a correction scenario, an S&P 500 push toward the 1,487 to 1,550 range may be needed to clear the post-QE euphoria. Silver (SLV) was the best performing major ETF during QE2. On Monday, SLV experienced a bearish MACD cross, which increases the odds of a correction. Trading For A Living by Dr. Alexander Elder provides some insight on this indicator:

MACD crossovers identify shifts in the balance of power between the bulls and the bears. When the black MACD line drops below the red MACD line, it shows that the bears dominate the market, and it is better to trade from the short side. When the black line moves below the red line, it gives a sell signal (see red arrow below).

MACD signals on daily charts are not nearly as important as those that appear on weekly or monthly charts, but the bearish cross on silver’s chart below does show QE-friendly assets are losing upside momentum. We took profits in SLV last week, but are not advocating shorting silver. Another push higher is possible, but any subsequent gains in SLV may be hard to sustain unless MACD improves.

Williams %R is another valuable tool to track momentum. On the daily chart of the S&P 500 below, the indicator is showing a discernible decline in bullish conviction. A move back above -20 would alleviate some of our short-term concerns.

Looking around the globe, numerous ETFs have waning upside momentum, which increases the odds of a more substantial correction.

On Monday we learned an index of business confidence in Germany, the biggest economy in Europe, fell for a fifth straight month. The FEZ ETF below dropped 0.70%.

According to Reuters, about 2,000 Chinese employees of an iPhone assembly company fought into the early hours of Monday, forcing the huge electronics plant where they work to be shut down. EEM was able to stay nearly flat on Monday (see below).

In a recent video, we outlined numerous ways to monitor the battle between risk-on and risk-off, including tracking the performance of stocks (SPY) relative to bonds (TLT). For the balance of the week, the primary driver of risk assets will be Spain. If Spain (EWP) outlines new measures as expected on Thursday and simultaneously requests help from the European Central Bank, stocks and QE-friendly ETFs could shoot higher again. But if Spain disappoints on any front this week, tired stocks and commodities could experience a “give back” period similar to what occurred in November 2010 (see two charts below).

We are currently maintaining a relatively high cash position. If the charts improve and the news from Europe allows, we are happy to jump back on the reflation train. Our shopping list includes QE2 winners such as silver, oil stocks (XOP), and mining companies (XME).

Source: http://ciovaccocapital.com/wordpress/index.php/politics/germany-may-throw-markets-bearish-curve/

source their website

OSHA Director: Offshore Cleanup Workers Will Get More Training

Sasha Chavkin

Participants in the Vessels of Opportunity Program maintain and replace boom in Caminada Bay in Port Fourchon, La., to prevent oil from hitting the marshes on June 17, 2010. (U.S. Coast Guard photo by Petty Officer 3rd Class Ann Marie Gorden)Last week, we reported that experts and health officials are concerned that Gulf cleanup workers aren't getting enough safety training. On Thursday, C-SPAN asked the head of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration about our reporting -- and he agreed that "more training is needed" for many spill responders.

We spoke with OSHA's director, David Michaels, after that interview, and he said the agency is working with BP to increase the safety training for workers on vessels at sea.

Michaels said he did not know exactly when the new classes would begin, but said it should be within days: "We've moving as quickly as we can."

The course will increase in length from four to eight hours, and will address new subjects including workers' rights and protection from chemical hazards, Michaels said. Like the current training, it will be taught by contractors hired by BP, with monitoring and advice from OSHA.

The longer classes will be provided to offshore workers in the Vessels of Opportunity program -- which employs local boat operators and crews in cleanup activities -- but not to shoreline responders who are cleaning the beaches. In his appearance on C-SPAN, Michaels said that by the time oil reaches the beaches, it has been weathered long enough that it has "lost all of its volatile chemicals," eliminating the risk of airborne exposure.

"We're aiming for the workers on the Vessels of Opportunity, whose exposure to weathered oil has increased," Michaels told us. He said the additional training is crucial because these workers are now collecting oil-soaked boom at sea in addition to laying fresh boom. (Last week, a health official involved in planning the training told us that the current curriculum doesn't include chemical inhalation, the health effects of dispersants, or the risks of direct contact with weathered oil.)

There are currently 2,630 local boats in the cleanup program, according to the latest data from Unified Command, the interagency spill response team made up of BP, Transocean, the Coast Guard and numerous federal agencies. The Unified Command's website has no information about the total number of people on the boats, and a Unified Command spokeswoman said she did not have that information.

As we noted last week, the Louisiana health department is tracking complaints from cleanup workers who are continuing to report health problems that they believe are related to chemical exposure, including vomiting, dizziness, and nose and throat irritation.

Michaels also dismissed concerns raised in recent reports by McClatchy Newspapers that OSHA's ability to ensure compliance from BP is hampered by limits on his agency's jurisdiction, which extends only three miles offshore. He said that OSHA's participation in the Unified Command allowed it to protect worker safety beyond its usual boundary.

"We are working through the Unified Command system," Michaels said. "Just because there is a line three miles out there, that has no impact."

An OSHA spokesman told us that the agency would provide us with more information -- including the curriculum of the new course -- as soon as it became available. We'll update you when we hear more.

Source: http://feeds.propublica.org/~r/propublica/energy-environment/~3/6xTx3tHGtRs/

united states url

Wednesday, 26 September 2012

Under the Hood: First Asset Morningstar US Dividend Target 50 (UXM)


This post is part of a series called Under the Hood, where l take a detailed look at specific Canadian ETFs or index funds.

The fund: First Asset Morningstar US Dividend Target 50 Index ETF (UXM)

The index: The fund tracks the Morningstar US Dividend Target 50 Index, which was created specifically for this ETF. The methodology screens US companies based on five criteria: expected dividend yield, cash flow/debt ratio, five-year normal EPS growth, return on equity (latest quarter), and three-month EPS estimate revision. To ensure liquidity, all stocks in the index must also be among the top third in average daily trading volume. The top 50 stocks in this screen are then equally weighted in the portfolio (2% each) and rebalanced quarterly.

The cost: The fund’s management fee is 0.60%. Because the fund is less than a year old it has not published its full MER, but expect it to be at least 0.68% after factoring in the Ontario Harmonized Sales Tax.

The details: UXM is designed to give dividend-focused Canadians a one-stop solution for diversifying into the US market. The index is based on the US Income model portfolio that is part of Morningstar’s Computerized Portfolio Management Services (CPMS), popular with fund managers and investment advisers. The fund uses currency hedging to eliminate exposure to the US dollar.

Some of the more well-known companies in the fund include Coca-Cola, Johnson & Johnson, Colgate Palmolive, Chevron, Exxon Mobil, 3M, Pfizer, Merck, Verizon and Caterpillar. At least half are household names, though there are a smattering of lesser-knowns as well.

Unlike several other dividend ETFs, UXM does not screen for companies that have a long record of dividend growth, which I think is right approach. While I understand the appeal of dividend growers, is a company that has grown its dividend for 20 consecutive years—which is necessary to be part of the S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index—really a better investment than one that missed a couple of increases for legitimate business reasons? This part of the Aristocrats methodology strikes me as arbitrary and backward-looking. As it happens, only seven of UXM’s holdings are on the Aristocrats list.

Dividend-growth strategies are also biased toward older, mature companies, which in the US effectively makes them dramatically underweight in technology and energy. The sector breakdown in UXM, by contrast, is more similar to that of the U.S. large cap market as a whole:

S&P 500 Aristocrats UXM
Financials (incl. REITs) 14.2% 19.1% 10.0%
Energy 11.2% 1.3% 10.2%
Materials 3.3% 10.4% 3.9%
Industrials 10.2% 14.6% 13.7%
Consumer Discretionary 10.8% 11.2% 8.1%
Telecommunications 3.4% 3.3% 6.0%
Information Technology 19.8% 3.2% 10.0%
Consumer Staples 11.4% 19.4% 20.3%
Utilities 3.8% 10.6% 7.7%
Health Care 11.9% 7.1% 10.1%

The ETF was launched in February, so it’s too soon to say anything meaningful about its performance. The fact sheet gives the index yield as 4.59%; however, the ETF’s first two quarterly distributions were $0.0527 and $0.0944 per share. That first dividend does not cover a whole quarter, so if we just annualize the second figure and assume an average share price of $10, that’s a yield of about 3.78%.

The alternatives: UXM’s most significant competitor in Canada is the iShares S&P US Dividend Growers Index Fund (CUD), which tracks the index discussed above. The two funds have the same fee, but as we’ve seen, they have very different holdings. BlackRock has also just launched the iShares US High Dividend Equity Index Fund (XHD), which tracks a different Morningstar index. Although XHD holds 75 stocks, it is cap-weighted and its top 10 holdings comprise more than 60% of the fund.

Bottom line: In my view, UXM is the best choice for dividend-oriented investors who want an ETF that trades in Canadian dollars and uses currency hedging. Its index focuses on fundamental factors without imposing an arbitrary screen for dividend growth, and its equal-weighting avoids concentration any single company. As a result, it overcomes many of the flaws of its competitors. However, investors who are willing to accept currency risk can find several lower-cost choices among US-listed ETFs, such as the Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM).

Disclosure: I do not currently own UXM in my own portfolio.

Source: http://canadiancouchpotato.com/2012/08/18/under-the-hood-first-asset-morningstar-us-dividend-target-50-uxm/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=under-the-hood-first-asset-morningstar-us-dividend-target-50-uxm

see page site

Celebrating Poetry

Bill Moyers revisits the Dodge Poetry Festival.

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/bmjvodcast/~3/_ymPvxMV3Lw/watch3.html

check this out click

W. S. Merwin, Part I

On the heels of winning this year's Pulitzer prize for poetry, W.S. Merwin joins Bill Moyers for a wide-ranging conversation about language, his writing process, the natural world, and the insights gleaned from a much-lauded career of more than 50 years. W.S. Merwin is the author of 21 volumes of poetry and won his second Pulitzer Prize for his most recent collection, THE SHADOW OF SIRIUS.

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/bmjvodcast/~3/EQCi9HK_gT8/watch.html

moved here my company

Tuesday, 25 September 2012

Rise in Offshore Spills Raises Wider Questions on Drilling

Sasha Chavkin

A flare burns from a drill ship recovering oil from the ruptured BP well over the site in the Gulf of Mexico on June 9, 2010. (Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images) The catastrophe unfolding in the Gulf of Mexico has been portrayed as a one-of-a-kind disaster, a perfect storm of bad equipment, bad planning and bad luck.

But it’s far from the only spill that’s taken place this year – or even the only spill occurring in the Gulf right now.

On June 7, the Mobile Press-Register reported that the Ocean Saratoga rig has been leaking into the Gulf since April 30. Interior Department spokeswoman Kendra Barkoff confirmed the next day that “small amounts of oil” were leaking from the wells beneath the rig, about 10 miles from Louisiana’s southeastern coast.

Taylor Energy, the well’s owner, said in a statement that it was engaged in an “ongoing well intervention plan” with the government to fix damage caused by Hurricane Ivan in 2004, and that no significant new spill had occurred.

The Deepwater Horizon isn’t the only recent spill for BP, either. On May 25, according to Reuters, an accident on the Trans-Alaska pipeline spilled thousands of barrels of oil and forced the pipeline to be shut down for more than three days. BP is the largest owner of the pipeline operator, controlling 47 percent. (Read our story about BP’s troubled history in Alaska and its other U.S. operations.)

In addition, there was the Jan. 24 spill in Port Arthur, Texas, when an Exxon-Mobil tanker collided with an outgoing vessel and dumped nearly half a million gallons of oil into the Gulf.

If it seems as if oil spills – and particularly offshore spills in US. waters – are on the rise, that’s because they are.

A USA Today analysis of federal data found that spills from offshore oil rigs and pipelines have more than quadrupled in the last decade. From the 1970s to 1990s, offshore facilities averaged four spills per year of more than 50 barrels. From 2000 to 2009, the annual average soared to 17.

The report also found that the rate of oil being spilled was increasing faster than the growth in production. From USA Today:

In the 1980s, an average of about 2,900 barrels of oil and other toxic chemicals spilled a year. That figure rose to more than 4,400 in the 1990s and to more than 6,100 in the 2000s. Offshore oil production increased during that time, but the rate of barrels spilled per barrels produced continued to increase.

The company with the most spills in the last decade was BP, which had reported 23 spills of over 50 barrels without counting the Deepwater Horizon blowout.

Why are offshore oil facilities spilling more in recent years than they have in the past?

One possibility is that regulators haven’t been able to keep up with the surge in offshore drilling. The Washington Post reported Thursday morning that the Minerals Management Service has only seven more inspectors now that it did in 1985, even as offshore drilling projects have skyrocketed. From the Post:

Although the number of exploration rigs soared and the number of deep-water oil-producing projects grew more than tenfold from 1988 to 2008, the number of federal inspectors working for the Minerals Management Service has increased only 13 percent since 1985.

A message left for MMS this morning has not been returned.

Stefan Mrozewski, a drilling engineer with Columbia University’s Borehole Research Group and a former oil industry employee who once worked on the Deepwater Horizon, said the increase may in fact be driven by a very different dynamic – better voluntary reporting of spills by the industry.

Oil companies and service companies in the Gulf of Mexico “have – at least over the past 10 years – been extremely conscientious about report [sic] spills, incidents, hazards, etc,” wrote Mrozewski in an e-mail. “I would venture that the same attitude did not prevail in the 90s, and certainly not in the 70s.”

David Miller of the American Petroleum Institute, a trade association for the oil and gas industry, said that offshore drilling was heavily regulated by the government, citing the MMS’s extensive guidelines for deepwater drilling.

“There’s quite a few regulations that the industry has to follow to be in compliance with the MMS,” said Miller.

Another possibility is that oil is simply harder to reach now – that increased consumption has led companies to turn to deeper waters and riskier procedures to satisfy the ever-expanding demand for energy.

“While the point of “peak oil” may or may not have been reached, what Michael Klare, a professor at Hampshire College, has dubbed the Age of Tough Oil has clearly begun,” wrote the New Yorker’s Elizabeth Kolbert on May 31.

Source: http://feeds.propublica.org/~r/propublica/energy-environment/~3/A6XyTCX78yQ/

their website this link

Anna Deavere Smith pt 1

While politicians and the media war over "the public option" and "bending the cost curve," acclaimed actress-playwright Anna Deavere Smith and her one-woman play "LET ME DOWN EASY" give voice to questions of life and death, sickness and healthcare.

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/bmjvodcast/~3/-ntgY1mctTI/profile.html

(visit) .. [read more]

Bear Stearns Investors Settle Claims for $275 Million

A group of Bear Stearns shareholders who claimed to have been hurt by the investment bank's deteriorating health has agreed to settle its claims for $275 million, four years after the firm was sold to JPMorgan Chase.

Source: http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/06/07/bear-stearns-investors-settle-claims-for-275-million/?partner=rssnyt&emc=rss

their website this link

Monday, 24 September 2012

The Economy Ahead: What to Expect in 2012

Filed under: ,

What to expect in 2012With 2011 fast coming to a close, it's time to think about what's next -- if you dare.

The good news is, there's less talk among the experts of a double-dip recession. But there's also little sign that it's time to pop the champagne cork. The general expectation is for the economy to grow between 2% and 2.5% in 2012 -- not great, but better than no growth.

Some are even more pessimistic. In the recently released annual Bank of America Merrill Lynch 2012 CFO Outlook, 38% of financial executives at U.S. companies said they expected the U.S. economy to expand in 2012, down from 56% in last year's survey and 66% the year before. But only 7% predicted layoffs, and some 46% plan to hire -- the same percentage as planned to in 2011. And 36% said credit had gotten easier to access, compared to 28% last year.

So, there are positive signs, but uncertainly looms large. In the recent Country Financial Security Index, 30% of respondents said they believed 2012 would be better than 2011, 28% said it would be worse and 32% said about the same.

"Next year will be more about the middle and less about the extremes that we've suffered in 2011," says Mark Lamkin, CEO of Lamkin Wealth Management. Over the last four years, the markets had 2% declines about 100 times more than any other time in S&P history. It also recorded 2% daily gains more times that ever before. "Unprecedented was the norm in 2011. Next year will be a year of meeting in the middle."

Expect a modest, but sustained, recovery. The economy won't fire on all cylinders though, predicted Alan Levenson, chief economist for T. Rowe Price: There are too many "what ifs?"

Here's a look at some of the factors that will help determine the fate of 2012.

The Job Market


With unemployment still stuck near 9%, inquiring minds want to know whether 2012 will bring any real relief for job seekers? It may be too close to call. "Job growth picks up in the second half of 2012, but the unemployment rate is expected to be little changed in the fourth quarter of 2012 versus the fourth quarter of this year," said Levenson.

Eurozone Crisis

The European sovereign debt crisis won't be solved over night. Some experts are forecasting a mild recession on the Continent, but others go a step further. "Europe will enter a deeper recession with some of the PIIGS [Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Greece and Spain] defaulting and credit downgrades of some major European banks and governments," says Bill Garrett of Garrett Financial.

The European Central Bank is likely to do either a quantitative easing program, a TARP-style program, or a Eurobond deal if Germany approves, or perhaps a combination of these. "This will put Europe in recession, but avoid a run on banks and a Lehman style event," says Lamkin.

China Taps the Brakes


Slowing demand from China, combined with Beijing's ongoing money-tightening measures, is prompting concern that this vital engine of economic activity may lose momentum at an inopportune time for the rest of the world, said Scott Berg, portfolio manager of T. Rowe Price's Global Large-Cap Stock Fund.

Stock Market Oscillations


For the equities markets, there's just one word -- volatility. The elections, congressional gridlock, and the European debt crisis will be the chief stirrers of the uncertainty pot. "Look for more of the same," says Mickey Cargile, founder and managing partner of Cargile Investment Management. "Investors will need to be patient and have the courage not to bail out of the stock market. I've never seen a stock market that wants to go up as much as this."

Lamkin is optimistic: "With record earnings in the S&P 500 this year, earnings get even better and as confidence returns the P/E's expand for the market," he says. "This leads to a total return in stocks of 8% to 12% for 2012."

Bond Market Inversions


"Risky bonds [will] become 'safe' and 'safe' [will] become risky," predicts Lamkin. "Fixed income bonds face headwinds of higher rates before year's end, six months ahead of the Fed's schedule."

Municipal bonds won't have as good a year in 2012 as they did in 2011, but because of a favorable supply and demand outlook, they should post mid-single-digit gains, says Lamkin.

View Poll

The government and corporate bond yield gap will narrow, says Frank Fantozzi, CEO of Planned Financial Services. The performance gap between government and corporate bonds will reverse in 2012, with corporate bonds outperforming as they post modest single-digit gains as interest rates rise and credit spreads narrow. He says bond yields may be volatile within a 1.7% to 3% range, but he expects them to rise over the course of the year, with the yield on the 10-year Treasury ending the year around 3%.

Ongoing economic growth will help normalize interest rates, as will a continuation of Fed policy, stable inflation and tightening fiscal policy. The wide gaps between yield on government bonds and other bonds are likely to converge some in 2012, says Fantozzi.

Gold Keeps Going

2011 was a bull year for gold, with record prices topping $1,900. Will they keep rising in 2012? David Morgan, publisher of The Morgan Report, which focuses on money, metals and mining, believes precious metals will continue to rise because of the inability of the global financial system to do anything other than take the "easiest" way out of the Eurozone debt crisis: debasing the euro, rather than letting massive debt defaults occur.

Sponsored Links
"I do expect a soft first quarter of 2012," says Morgan. "More consolidation through the summer and higher prices by year end. $60 silver by year end 2012 and gold over $2400. But it may take a year to get to those prices."

"If the euro problem does not get resolved in some meaningful way, gold could begin its move much earlier and faster," says Morgan.

Cargile, on the other hand, says there is no reason to buy gold. "Gold produces no income; it depends on someone buying it for more than you paid. It's a manipulated market, and volatile."

Politics As Usual


The U.S. credit rating downgrade was largely caused by political intransigence, and as we roll toward the November elections, it will get harder and harder for the opposing parties in Washington to find common ground. "Political gridlock will continue," says Cargile. "It's working for them, but it isn't for us."

But there's the possibility that as the election nears, Obama and the GOP nominee will leave behind the extremes and meet in the middle, which business likes, says Lamkin. "If voters vote accordingly, the most important budget decisions since World War II will be made with the right candidates with a bipartisan banner. After the election, I believe the market will have a strong fourth quarter based on this meeting in the middle and optimistic outlook."

Housing Begins Its Rebound

The first half of 2012 may be the last great opportunity to purchase a home at the lowest market prices we have seen in many years, and at the lowest interest rates we can remember, says Scott Cramer, endowment strategist and president of Cramer & Rauchegger.

From October 2010 to October 2011, the inventory of existing homes for sale dropped from 3.8 million homes to 3.3 million. That's still an excess of inventory, but we could see a major jump in home sales next year as banks realize that the homes they are holding on to will sell, giving them an incentive to release their inventory more quickly, he says. This could lead to the beginning of a slight increase in home prices by late 2012. The Fed also stated recently that it could ease off its commitment to leave interest rates unchanged until 2013, and could slightly increase rates before the end of 2012.

The Smart Moves for You in 2012

So what does all this mean to you? The experts weighed in on smart moves to make in light of the conventional wisdom about what to expect next year.

o. Seek dividends: One problem companies share with individuals is that their bank deposits aren't making them any money. So some of those earnings are getting paid out in dividends to shareholders. There are many solid, well-run companies with great balance sheets paying more than 4% on an annual basis.

o. Consider small and mid-cap U.S. stocks: These should provide attractive returns for investors in 2012, in part due to mergers and acquisitions activity powered by large corporate cash reserves.

o. Skip emerging markets ... or not: The jury's still out on emerging markets. Some experts say to avoid them, "Buy domestic, not emerging markets or Europe. Buy what you understand. U.S. corporations are strong," says Cargile. But other experts think they're returns will exceed those of developed markets. Long term, emerging markets offer intriguing growth prospects.

o. Get creative
: You may have dismissed bonds because with a fixed income vehicle, the interest rate is locked in and principal will be negatively impacted by inflation. However, a step-up bond starts with one rate, then increases after a period of time. This gives the fixed income investor a degree of inflation protection, says Cary Guffey, a financial adviser with NBC Securities.

o. Keep up good habits: The recession tamed consumer spending, sparked saving and inspired us to pay down debt. Don't stop in 2012. Start or continue building your emergency fund until you have at least six months of living expenses stashed. Diversify. Stay cool when it comes to the stock market. The wild ride is far from over. Rethink any rash moves motivated by emotions.

Mostly, be ready for anything.










Correction: A previous version of this story referred to Mickey Cargile's firm as WNB Private Client Service. In 2011, that company changed its name to Cargile Investment Management.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Source: http://www.dailyfinance.com/2011/12/28/the-economy-ahead-what-to-expect-in-2012/

best site blog